Views: 222 Author: Astin Publish Time: 2025-03-24 Origin: Site
Content Menu
>> Key Components and Terminology
● The Long X Bridge: A Historical Overview
● Factors Leading to Replacement
● The Demolition and Replacement Process
>> Construction of the New Bridge
● FAQ About Truss Bridges and the Long X Bridge
>> 2. What are the primary forces acting on a truss bridge?
>> 3. What is the Warren truss design, and why was it used for the Long X Bridge?
>> 4. What factors led to the replacement of the Long X Bridge?
>> 5. What is the significance of the Long X Bridge in the history of bridge engineering?
The Long X Truss Bridge, a notable structure in the western frontier, stands as a testament to engineering ingenuity and historical significance. This essay delves into the history, design, and eventual replacement of the Long X Truss Bridge, highlighting its importance and the factors that led to its decommissioning. The Long X bridge is a Warren thru truss bridge. It is located over the Little Missouri River on Highway 85/ND 200 in McKenzie County.
Before exploring the specifics of the Long X Truss Bridge, it's essential to understand the basics of truss bridge design. A truss bridge is a bridge whose load-bearing superstructure is composed of a truss, a structure of connected elements, usually forming triangular units. Truss bridges utilize a framework of interconnected beams, typically arranged in repeating triangular patterns, to support weight and distribute stress effectively. The nature of a truss allows the analysis of its structure using a few assumptions and the application of Newton's laws of motion according to the branch of physics known as statics. For purposes of analysis, trusses are assumed to be pin jointed where the straight components meet, meaning that taken alone, every joint on the structure is functionally considered to be a flexible joint as opposed to a rigid joint with the strength to maintain its shape, and the resulting shape and strength of the structure are only maintained by the interlocking of the components. In a truss bridge, two long - usually straight members known as chords - form the top and bottom; they are connected by a web of vertical posts and diagonals. The bridge is supported at the ends by abutments and sometimes in the middle by piers. A properly designed and built truss will distribute stresses throughout its structure, allowing the bridge to safely support its own weight, the weight of vehicles crossing it, and wind loads.
Several common truss designs have been employed in bridge construction, each with unique characteristics:
- Pratt Truss: Uses vertical members in compression and diagonal members in tension.
- Howe Truss: Employs vertical members in tension and diagonal members in compression.
- Warren Truss: Characterized by diagonal members that alternate in direction, forming a series of V or W shapes. The Warren truss is the simplest design of the Truss Bridge, with two sides, a bottom, and the railing in simple triangle forms.
- Bollman Truss: The design employs wrought iron tension members and cast iron compression members.
- Bowstring Truss: While similar in appearance to a tied-arch bridge, a bowstring truss has diagonal load-bearing members.
- Brown Truss: In the Brown truss all vertical elements are under tension, with the exception of the end posts.
- Chords: The top and bottom longitudinal members of the truss.
- Web Members: The vertical and diagonal elements connecting the chords.
- Abutments: The supports at the bridge's ends that anchor it to the ground.
- Piers: Intermediate supports in the middle of the bridge span.
- Through Truss: The truss is both above and below the roadbed.
- Deck Truss: The truss is above the roadbed.
A truss's ability to distribute tension and compression forces throughout its structure is fundamental to its strength. The top of the truss undergoes compression and the lower part undergoes tension. Understanding how these forces are managed is crucial to appreciating the design and functionality of truss bridges.
The Long X Bridge, built in 1959, spanned 969 feet over the Little Missouri River on Highway 85/ND 200 in McKenzie County. The Long X is an impressive 969 feet long with the largest span 325 feet. It was a rare cantilevered Warren thru truss bridge with alternating vertical members. In 2019 Veit was contracted to remove 969' long high truss bridge, a piece of history out in the western frontier. The 1959 historic Long X Bridge needed to be replaced with a wider, four-laned bridge.
Constructed in 1959, the Long X Bridge was a noteworthy example of engineering of its time. Its Warren truss design and cantilevered structure allowed it to span the Little Missouri River efficiently. The bridge's total length of 969 feet, with the largest span measuring 325 feet, made it an impressive structure in the region.
The Long X Bridge served as a vital transportation link in western North Dakota, facilitating the movement of people and goods across the Little Missouri River. As part of Highway 85/ND 200, it played a crucial role in connecting communities and supporting economic activities in the area.
Despite its historical and functional importance, the Long X Bridge was eventually slated for replacement. Several factors contributed to this decision:
Over the decades, traffic volumes on Highway 85/ND 200 increased significantly, placing greater demands on the Long X Bridge. The original two-lane design became inadequate to handle the growing number of vehicles, leading to congestion and safety concerns.
Like many bridges of its age, the Long X Bridge experienced structural deterioration over time. Exposure to the elements, combined with the constant stress of traffic, caused wear and tear on its components. Regular inspections and maintenance were necessary to ensure its continued safety, but eventually, replacement became the more practical option.
Modern bridge design standards have evolved since the Long X Bridge was constructed in 1959. Newer bridges are designed to accommodate larger vehicles, higher traffic volumes, and stricter safety requirements. Replacing the Long X Bridge allowed for the implementation of these updated standards, resulting in a safer and more efficient transportation corridor.
The process of demolishing the Long X Bridge and constructing its replacement was a complex undertaking that required careful planning and execution. Veit was contracted to remove the bridge.
Prior to the removal of the bridge, Veit was required to submit a detailed engineered demolition plan that addressed the removal of the bridge superstructure and piers, provides environmental protection, and sequences the salvage operation. This included assessing environmental impacts, coordinating with stakeholders, and developing detailed engineering plans.
Veit started the project in late 2020 by removing the concrete bridge deck. Once the bridge deck was removed, Veit shored the 250' portion of the bridge that required salvage and disassembly. Structural demolition of the bridge began once the bridge was surgically disconnected from the portion that was being salvaged. Special consideration and detailed planning were required in controllably felling the structure as the spans were cantilevered over the piers and the newly constructed bridge, carrying traffic, was only a mere 29 feet away.
The new bridge was designed to address the limitations of the original structure. It featured a wider, four-lane configuration to accommodate increased traffic volumes. Modern materials and construction techniques were employed to ensure greater durability, safety, and longevity.
The Long X Truss Bridge, built in 1959, served as a vital transportation link across the Little Missouri River. Over time, increased traffic volumes, structural deterioration, and evolving design standards necessitated its replacement. The demolition and replacement process required careful planning and execution to minimize disruption and ensure safety. The new, wider bridge provides a safer and more efficient transportation corridor for the region. The legacy of the Long X Truss Bridge lives on as a reminder of the engineering achievements of the past and the ongoing efforts to modernize infrastructure for the future.
A truss bridge is a type of bridge that uses a truss, which is a structure made of connected elements, usually forming triangular units. These bridges are designed to distribute weight and stress efficiently, allowing them to support heavy loads over long distances.
The primary forces acting on a truss bridge are tension and compression. Tension is a pulling force, while compression is a pushing force. The design of a truss bridge ensures that these forces are distributed throughout the structure, maintaining its stability.
The Warren truss design is characterized by diagonal members that alternate in direction, forming a series of V or W shapes. This design is known for its efficiency in distributing loads and stresses, making it a popular choice for bridges with long spans. The Long X Bridge utilized a cantilevered Warren thru truss design, which allowed it to efficiently span the Little Missouri River.
Several factors contributed to the replacement of the Long X Bridge, including increased traffic volume, structural deterioration, and modernization standards. The original two-lane design was inadequate to handle the growing number of vehicles, and the bridge experienced wear and tear over time. Replacing the bridge allowed for the implementation of updated design standards, resulting in a safer and more efficient transportation corridor.
The Long X Bridge, built in 1959, represents a significant achievement in bridge engineering of its time. Its Warren truss design and cantilevered structure allowed it to efficiently span the Little Missouri River, serving as a vital transportation link in western North Dakota. While it was eventually replaced due to modernization needs, its legacy lives on as a reminder of the engineering accomplishments of the past.
[1] http://pghbridges.com/basics.htm
[2] https://humptydumptyfalls.weebly.com/truss-bridge.html
[3] https://veitusa.com/project/long-x-bridge/
[4] https://blog.statemuseum.nd.gov/blog/bridges
[5] https://garrettsbridges.com/design/trussdesign/
[6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truss_bridge
[7] https://usbridge.com/faq/
[8] https://www.tn.gov/tdot/structures-/historic-bridges/what-is-a-truss-bridge.html
[9] https://www.ncdot.gov/initiatives-policies/Transportation/bridges/historic-bridges/Documents/ithb2.pdf
[10] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_longest_continuous_truss_bridge_spans
[11] https://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/docs/NCHRP25-25(15)_FR.pdf
[12] https://www.tn.gov/tdot/structures-/historic-bridges/history-of-a-truss-bridge.html
[13] https://www.britannica.com/technology/truss-bridge
[14] https://www.enr.com/articles/38496-the-worlds-ten-longest-continuous-truss-bridges?page=2
[15] https://www.teachengineering.org/lessons/view/ind-2472-analysis-forces-truss-bridge-lesson
[16] https://blog.dixonvalve.com/bridges-history-design-and-construction
[17] https://www.enr.com/articles/38496-the-worlds-ten-longest-continuous-truss-bridges
[18] https://blogs.loc.gov/inside_adams/2024/09/truss-bridge/
[19] http://www.vermontbridges.com/wood%20truss%20highway%20bridges.htm
[20] https://www.conteches.com/media/b00pylfs/pedestrian-truss-detail-sheet_print.pdf
[21] https://www.calctree.com/resources/truss
[22] https://repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/2433/253253/2/dkogk04678.pdf
[23] https://openjicareport.jica.go.jp/pdf/12146072_02.pdf
[24] https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-5354
[25] https://sear.unisq.edu.au/31493/1/Sutcliffe_W_Banerjee.pdf
[26] https://www.tn.gov/content/dam/tn/tdot/structures/historic-bridges/chapter5.pdf
[27] https://openjicareport.jica.go.jp/pdf/12304580_02.pdf
[28] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axwaAQZ4Ykk
